On July 5, 2023, UpRights conducted a workshop for judges and prosecutors from French-speaking African countries in the context of the high-level training programme on international criminal law and transnational criminal law organised by the T.M.C. Asser Instituut, the Antonio Cassese Initiative, and the International Nuremberg Principles Academy.

The workshop aimed at strengthening domestic legal capacity to prosecute international and transnational crimes. UpRights’ Co-Director Valérie Gabard delivered an interactive presentation on investigating conflict-related sexual violence, allowing participants to engage in active discussions concerning its scope and implications in the context of warcrimes and crimes against humanity. The exercise centered on prosecuting international crimes in the context of the fight against terrorism, with a particular emphasis on sexual and gender-based violence.

The course was developed to equip judges and prosecutors with practical skills, tools, and knowledge necessary to address international and transnational crimes effectively. Essential topics covered included the elements of these crimes, modes of liability, strategic planning for investigations, and ensuring the protection of victims and witnesses. By establishing a robust regional and international network, this training program seeks to enhance cooperation among national and international judiciaries and facilitate effective collaboration with the International Criminal Court (ICC) and other judicial bodies.

On June 22nd, UpRights took part in the presentation of the Benchbook on the Adjudication of International Crimes under Ukrainian Domestic Law. Building upon a judicial need assessment promoted by the USAID Justice for All Activity in July 2022, the Benchbook was developed in close cooperation with the Ukrainian Supreme Court and the National School of Judges of Ukraine by Ukrainian judges, UpRights and Global Rights Compliance supported by MATRA-Ukraine Project.

Since the start of the war on February 24, 2022, Ukrainian courts have received 124 war crimes cases rendering 33 judgments with 91 cases currently pending. Having acknowledged the necessity for the Ukrainian judicial system to prosecute and judge an increasing amount of war crimes, the Benchbook was created to provide judges with a structured framework to adjudicate international crimes in accordance with international and domestic norms and procedures.

By compiling relevant international legal sources, including international treaties, judicial decisions, and academic commentaries, and evaluating their applicability at the domestic level in the context of international crimes, the publication aims to assist judges in the interpretation and application of the relevant domestic offences. The Benchbook is designed to help promote accountability for international crimes by providing critical support to judicial processes at the national level, strengthening the legal framework and increasing the capacity of courts to draft high-quality and well-reasoned judgments in international crimes cases.

UpRights contribution to the drafting of this important document is intended to help address the growing number of criminal proceedings being registered, classified and adjudicated in the Ukrainian context in order to support the important work of the National School of Judges in pursuing the administration of justice for international crimes.

UpRights Co-Founder Alessandro Pizzuti has co-authored with Assistant Professor Giulia Pinzauti, UpRights Advisory Board Member, an article in the Journal of International Criminal Justice titled “Prosecuting Aggression against Ukraine as an ‘Other Inhumane Act’ before the ICC”.

The article, building on a past blogpost in OpinioJuris, revisits the possibility of prosecuting the underlying acts of aggression as crimes against humanity before the International Criminal Court, with specific reference to the February 2022 unlawful use of force against Ukraine by the Russian Federation.

In particular, the article contends that Russia’s unlawful use of force in breach of the right to self-determination of the Ukrainian people, which caused them great suffering or serious injury to mental/physical health, can be qualified as other inhumane acts under Article 7(1)(k) of the Rome Statute. While this approach has its challenges, it would allow the Court to prosecute the underlying acts of aggression as crimes against humanity avoiding the jurisdictional limitations that apply to the crime of aggression.

In a two-part blogpost (part 1 and part 2) published on OpinioJuris, UpRights co-founder Alessandro Pizzuti and Assistant Professor Giulia Pinzauti discuss the prospect of prosecuting aggression against Ukraine as the crime against humanity of “other Inhumane act” before the International Criminal Court.

The International Criminal Court’s lack of jurisdiction over the crime of aggression committed by the leadership of the Russian Federation and Belarus against Ukraine has prompted several voices to advocate alternative avenues to address a potential impunity gap, including the creation of a new international tribunal. The blogpost explores whether the ICC could exercise jurisdiction over the acts underlying Article 8bis of the Statute (crime of aggression) by subsuming the relevant conduct under the framework of crimes against humanity.

The Blogpost argues that while not without challenges, the intentional and severe violation of the right to self-determination of the Ukrainian people caused by Russia’s unlawful use of force caused the people of Ukraine great suffering or serious injury to mental or physical health that can be qualified as an other inhumane act under Article 7(1)(k) of the Statute.

In a Blogpost published on Opinio Juris as part of a symposium on the current crisis in Myanmar, UpRights co-founder Valérie Gabard and Kingsley Abbott, the Director of Global Accountability & International Justice at the International Commission of Jurists. argue that post-coup violations should be investigated as crimes against humanity under article 7 of the International Criminal Court Statute.

The post argues that considering this conclusion, it is critical that: States support the mandate of the Independent investigative Mechanism for Myanmar (IIMM), which has announced that crimes against humanity have “likely been committed” since the coup; possible for a for legal proceedings are actively identified, where evidence collected by the IIMM could help facilitate justice for the people of Myanmar; and the UN Security Council refer Myanmar to the ICC.

To read the full blog post follow the link

On 14 June 2021, UpRights co-Founder, Valérie Gabard, participated in the virtual seminar ‘Strengthening Domestic Capacity to Prosecute and Adjudicate International and Transnational Crimes in Africa’.

The high-level seminar, organised by the International Nuremberg Principles Academy, the Asser Institute and the Antonio Cassese Initiative, followed a training course held in February 2020 in Arusha, Tanzania and an online training in March 2021. 17 judges and prosecutors from Benin, Burkina Faso, Burundi, Cameroun, Chad, Democratic Republic of the Congo and Niger participated in the series of lectures of the high-level seminar.

UpRights conducted an interactive exercise for the Judges and Prosecutors’ oriented around the type of international crimes committed by armed groups and defence and security forces in respective West African contexts. The training allowed the participants to apply challenges present in their respective jurisdictions. Participants working individually and in groups identified whether war crimes and crimes against humanity may have been committed. The focus of the exercise was around the prosecution of international crimes in the context of the fight against terrorism with a particular focus on sexual and gender-based violence.