On February 2nd, 2024, UpRights and StraLi released the report Navigating Troubled Waters: Italy’s Human Rights Dilemma in the Mediterranean .

Shedding light on the human rights violations arising from the implementation of Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) signed by Italy and Libya, this report builds upon our Article 15 Communication to the International Criminal Court, which called for an investigation into the international crimes committed by Libyan armed groups against migrants following their interception at sea and return  to  Libya.

The Memorandum of Understanding: A Closer Look

As we approach the 7th anniversary of the MoU, the report delves into its negative human rights implications, calling for a critical examination of Italy’s cooperation practices with Libya and emphasizing the drastic need for a reformulation of such framework.

Tacitly renewed last in February 2023, the MoU has increased the capacity of Libya to intercept migrants and refugees. Nonetheless, the absence of human rights provisions in the framework of the agreement drastically impacted the basic human rights of vulnerable persons, with migrants intercepted at sea facing mistreatment, including arbitrary arrest, torture, inhuman treatment, and sexual violence.

Italy’s International Responsibilities

Our report argues that such violations inevitably render Italy’s position, and consequently the MoU itself, untenable, and situate Italy in violation of its human rights obligations through a policy of externalization.

Indeed, the conduct of Libyan authorities exposes Italy to international responsibility for the violation of several international conventions, including the United Nations Convention against Torture and other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment (CAT), the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR), and possibly the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR).

The material support provided by Italy may even implicate individual criminal responsibility for Italian agents assisting the Libyan authorities, potentially qualifying as war crimes and crimes against humanity.

Call to Action: Reframing Italy’s Cooperation Strategy

As such, the report calls for a reconsideration of Italy’s cooperation strategy with Libya, proposing two options to ensure compliance with international law obligations:

1. Amendment of the MoU: A human rights clause should be introduced, specifying that respect for human rights and international humanitarian law is essential. This clause should establish an independent body to monitor compliance, a list of mitigating measures for human rights violations, and a legal framework for effective access to justice.

2. Termination or Suspension of the MoU: If amendments consistent with human rights principles cannot be introduced, the report suggests the possibility of terminating or suspending the MoU. Violations by the Libyan authorities may justify such actions under Article 60 of the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties, providing leverage for negotiations on amendments in line with Italy’s human rights obligations.

Moving towards human rights

In light of the harsh realities faced by migrants in the Mediterranean, the report urges Italy to amend its policies to ensure compliance with international human rights standards. The report aims to encourage a constructive dialogue and tangible actions to ensure the protection of migrants’ rights and uphold Italy’s commitment to its international obligations.

Waves of the sea reflecting the focus area of the report

On Thursday, November 30th, 2023, UpRights’ Co-Director, Valérie Gabard, joined the Database Center for North Korean Human Rights (NKDB) for the release of their latest report ‘Behind Closed Doors: Mapping the System of Command in the Ministry of State Security & Social Security’. This collaborative effort aims to unravel the intricate web of human rights violations in North Korea, underscoring how the discourse on the North Korean human rights issues has progressively shifted from exposing the gravity of North Korean human rights violations to finding ways to hold perpetrators accountable.

Photo Credits: NKDB

The Report’s Focus: Responsibility and Accountability

Through the employment of its database comprising over 140,000 cases of human rights violations, NKDB was able to produce a report that delves into the organizational structure and systems of command within the North Korean Ministries of State Security and Social Security. The primary goal of the report is to shed light on the systematic and widespread human rights violations occurring within North Korea, emphasizing the need to identify the responsible individuals and organizations, as well as all those actors turning blind eye to the systematic and widespread violations happening in the country.

Photo Credits: NKDB

Valérie’s Insights: Exploring Superior Responsibility

In her contribution Valérie underlined how the type of work done by NKDB could assist in pursuing accountability because of its information-seeking character, indeed, according to the UpRights’ Co-Director, a better understanding the structure and organization of the Ministries could assist judges and prosecutors understand their power structures.

Drawing from her experience from working within the International Criminal Tribunals for the former Yugoslavia and Rwanda, Valérie emphasized the challenges of prosecuting individuals and specifically discussed the concept of ‘superior responsibility’ in the context of international law. While ‘superior responsibility’ is a well-established concept in international criminal law, its application becomes more nuanced in the Korean context, where no individuals have been prosecuted yet. For this exact reason, the report aims to go beyond merely identifying individuals and organizations but also to demonstrate effective control, a crucial aspect in establishing ‘superior responsibility.’

Photo Credits: NKDB

UpRights’ Contribution: Training and Collaboration

Between December 2022 and June 2023, UpRights has been providing investigative and legal advise in the context of collecting evidence and witness reports to better understand the structure and chain of command of the North Korean’s Regime. Furthermore, in January 2023, UpRights also provided the NKDB with trainings workshops aimed at strengthening their legal capacity in documentation and accountability-seeking efforts for crimes committed in North Korea

Looking back at last week’s event, UpRights expresses its pride in the long-term partnership with NKDB and extends gratitude to the entire team for their collaboration in this significant conference. The collective effort aims to bring justice to the victims of human rights violations in North Korea and holds the promise of a brighter future for those affected.

On July 18, 2023, UpRights Senior Legal Advisor David Kinnecome alongside Ukrainian judges led the fifth and final workshop focused on procedure in international crimes cases in Ukraine. The workshop is the final in a series of events organized by the USAID Justice for All Activity following the publication of the Benchbook on the Adjudication of International Crimes, which was developed by the USAID Justice for All Activity in partnership with the National School of Judges, Global Rights Compliance, and UpRights.

David and Ukrainian judges presented attendees with national and international perspectives on issues relating to trials in absentia, the assessment and admissibility of digital evidence, and the risks of re-victimization, which are relevant to adjudicating international crimes. In particular, the event highlighted how international practice and procedures can offer guidance and in certain instances persuasive authority when considering procedural issues under the Ukraine Criminal Procedure Code.

The event closed a series of thematic workshops organized following the publication of the Benchbook on 22 June 2023 to provide judges and other stakeholders with the opportunity to discuss substantial and procedural aspects of international crimes adjudication provided by the Benchbook.

On June 22nd, UpRights took part in the presentation of the Benchbook on the Adjudication of International Crimes under Ukrainian Domestic Law. Building upon a judicial need assessment promoted by the USAID Justice for All Activity in July 2022, the Benchbook was developed in close cooperation with the Ukrainian Supreme Court and the National School of Judges of Ukraine by Ukrainian judges, UpRights and Global Rights Compliance supported by MATRA-Ukraine Project.

Since the start of the war on February 24, 2022, Ukrainian courts have received 124 war crimes cases rendering 33 judgments with 91 cases currently pending. Having acknowledged the necessity for the Ukrainian judicial system to prosecute and judge an increasing amount of war crimes, the Benchbook was created to provide judges with a structured framework to adjudicate international crimes in accordance with international and domestic norms and procedures.

By compiling relevant international legal sources, including international treaties, judicial decisions, and academic commentaries, and evaluating their applicability at the domestic level in the context of international crimes, the publication aims to assist judges in the interpretation and application of the relevant domestic offences. The Benchbook is designed to help promote accountability for international crimes by providing critical support to judicial processes at the national level, strengthening the legal framework and increasing the capacity of courts to draft high-quality and well-reasoned judgments in international crimes cases.

UpRights contribution to the drafting of this important document is intended to help address the growing number of criminal proceedings being registered, classified and adjudicated in the Ukrainian context in order to support the important work of the National School of Judges in pursuing the administration of justice for international crimes.

On Friday, September 30, from 9 to 18:30, the Faculty of Law of the University of Bologna will host the Seminar “Migrants’ rights and international crimes. New perspectives and challenges for international and domestic jurisdiction” (Sala Armi, Palazzo Malvezzi, via Zamboni 22, Bologna and online).

The seminar is organized by StraLi for strategic litigation, UpRights and the Faculty of Law of the University of Bologna. Together with journalists, researchers, civil society’s representatives, lawyers, prosecutors, and judges, we will discuss pivotal issues at the intersection of migration and criminal law, such as the qualification of abuses against migrants as international crimes and the impact of European migration policies on human rights. It will comprise of three panels (panel 1 and 2 will be held in English, panel 3 in Italian) which will deal respectively with: migration policies from a human rights perspective; migrations and international criminal law; migrations and Italian criminal law.

Alessandro Pizzuti will be among the speakers of panel 1 to discuss human rights’ application at sea. Alice Giannini and Tomas Manguel will be among speakers of panel 2 and will discuss StraLi’s, UpRights’, and Adala for All’s Article 15 Communication on War Crimes and Crimes Against Humanity Committed Against Migrants and Asylum Seekers in Libya.

The full program, including the list of the topics discussed and the panelists, are available here.

No registration needed.

Save the date!

In a two-part blogpost (part 1 and part 2) published on OpinioJuris, UpRights co-founder Alessandro Pizzuti and Assistant Professor Giulia Pinzauti discuss the prospect of prosecuting aggression against Ukraine as the crime against humanity of “other Inhumane act” before the International Criminal Court.

The International Criminal Court’s lack of jurisdiction over the crime of aggression committed by the leadership of the Russian Federation and Belarus against Ukraine has prompted several voices to advocate alternative avenues to address a potential impunity gap, including the creation of a new international tribunal. The blogpost explores whether the ICC could exercise jurisdiction over the acts underlying Article 8bis of the Statute (crime of aggression) by subsuming the relevant conduct under the framework of crimes against humanity.

The Blogpost argues that while not without challenges, the intentional and severe violation of the right to self-determination of the Ukrainian people caused by Russia’s unlawful use of force caused the people of Ukraine great suffering or serious injury to mental or physical health that can be qualified as an other inhumane act under Article 7(1)(k) of the Statute.

On 28 April 2022, during a regular briefing to the United Nations Security Council on the situation in Libya, the Prosecutor of the International Criminal Court (ICC) reported that crimes committed against migrants in Libya may amount to crimes against humanity and war crimes and fall within the ICC jurisdiction. Never before had the Prosecutor been so clear on the nature of these crimes or his Office’s intention to pursue such a line of investigation.

These conclusions are fully consistent with the Article 15 Communication on War Crimes and Crimes Against Humanity Committed Against Migrants and Asylum Seekers in Libya filed on 17 January 2022 by UpRights, Adala for All, and StraLi. In his report the Prosecutor confirmed that the communication assisted his work and inquiry concerning relevant crimes committed against migrants in Libya.

The Article 15 Communication filed on 17 January 2022 – and now publicly available – concerns war crimes committed in Libya between 2017 and 2021 against migrants and asylum seekers. The Communication requests the ICC to investigate international crimes committed by Libyan armed groups against thousands of migrants, including women and children, trapped in detention centres in Libya following their interception at sea. Once returned to Libya, the victims were routinely and systematically subjected to various forms of mistreatments and abuse including murder, torture, rape, forced labour and forced conscription. The Communication underlines that the ICC Prosecutor must investigate war crimes against migrants and asylum seekers detained in Libya committed by Libyan armed groups and officials with the support of Italian and Maltese Authorities.

In a blog post published today on Justice in Conflict, UpRights co-founder Alessandro Pizzuti and Alice Giannini from StraLi discuss the ICC Prosecutor’s report to the United Nations Security Council and the content of the Article 15 Communication filed on 17 January 2022. The post reconstructs some of the challenges, in terms of qualification and jurisdiction, which are behind the ICC Prosecution’s conclusion that the abuses against migrants in Libya may qualify as war crimes and crimes against humanity.

The International Criminal Court must investigate war crimes against migrants and asylum seekers detained in Libya committed by Libyan armed groups and officials with the support of Italian and Maltese Authorities

(The Hague, Paris, Turin) 18 January 2022 – Yesterday, Adala for All, StraLi, and UpRights filed a Communication to the International Criminal Court (ICC) concerning crimes committed in Libya between 2017 and 2021 against migrants and asylum seekers which may amount to war crimes within the jurisdiction of the court. The Communication requests the ICC to investigate international crimes committed by Libyan armed groups against thousands of migrants, including women and children, trapped in detention centres in Libya following their interception at sea. Once returned to Libya, the victims were routinely and systematically subjected to various forms of mistreatments and abuse including murder, torture, rape, forced labour and forced conscription. The Communication underlines that the ICC Prosecutor should scrutinize, in addition to Libyan actors, the potential criminal conduct of Italian and Maltese authorities and officials for the support they provided to Libyan actors.

Since the Revolution of 2011, Libya has been subject to ongoing armed conflict and political instability. Armed groups have dominated smuggling and trafficking throughout the country and developed a predatory economy in which migrants are intercepted at sea during their journey to Europe, returned to Libya and placed in detention centres in which they are systematically subjected to serious abuses. Actors involved in the commission of these alleged crimes include members of armed groups in control of detention centres, acting under the nominal authority of Libyan authorities, as well as the Libyan Coast Guard and the Department Combatting Illegal Migration under the Ministry of Interior.

The crimes committed against migrants and asylum seekers qualify and should be investigated as war crimes under Article 8 of the ICC Statute. Members of armed groups, taking direct part in ongoing hostilities in Libya, have subjected migrants intercepted at sea to numerous abuses in detention centres under their control including murder, torture and/or cruel treatment, forced labour, hostage-taking, and various forms of sexual violence including rape and sexual slavery. The Communication submits that these acts meet the threshold necessary for war crimes as they took place in the context of and were associated with the ongoing armed conflict in Libya. Additionally, these crimes qualify as crimes against humanity under Article 7 of the ICC Statute.

The need to investigate and ensure accountability is heightened by the fact that a number of European authorities, including Italian and Maltese nationals, have facilitated the return of migrants to Libya leading to their detention and subsequent mistreatment. As observed by Ramadan Amani from Adala for All, “Crimes committed against migrants in Libya represent an emerging ‘pocket of impunity’ at the border of Europe which has become increasingly and openly accepted by the international community despite the massive amount of evidence of pervasive international crimes on Europe’s doorstep. Available evidence clearly points to responsibilities within Europe.”

Between 2017 and 2021, Italian authorities and officials provided crucial support to the Libyan Coast Guard to intercept migrants at sea and return them to detention centres including the provision of assets, equipment, maintenance and trainings. Italian and Maltese officials closely coordinated with the Libyan Coast Guard on rescue operations to ensure that migrants at sea would be intercepted and returned to Libya. The communication submits that the support provided by the Italian and Maltese authorities to the Libyan Coast Guard qualifies as a form of contribution to the crimes committed against migrants in detention centres and triggers international criminal responsibility under the ICC Statute.

Alessandro Pizzuti, co-founder of UpRights, underlines that “crimes committed against migrants in Libya differ from past atrocities generally addressed by international criminal courts and tribunals. In Libya the parties to the conflict target migrants because they are perceived as a crucial asset to advance their political and military objectives. To meet the new challenges that the world is facing, it is indispensable that the international criminal court provide robust responses to these new factual scenarios and dynamics”

The submitting organizations reiterate the need for investigation and potential prosecution of all relevant actors outlined in the Communication. As observed by Nicolò Bussolati, vice-President of StraLi, “the Communication requests the ICC to undertake an investigation and take an important first step to ensure that crimes related to migration, traditionally under the purview of human rights and refugee law, are scrutinized through the lens of international criminal law”.

For more information, please contact Alessandro Pizzuti: a.pizzuti@uprights.org

Read the Executive Summary of the ICC Communication and the Press Release.

About the Organizations

Adala For All is a not-for-profit organization, based in France, and composed of a network of dozens of Libyan human rights lawyers and jurists with expertise in the MENA region. Through its members, based in Libya, AFA works with victims and members of local CSOs in need of legal support to defend their cases in front of national courts and access to international accountability mechanisms.

StraLi is an Italian NGO aiming at the promotion and protection of human rights through the judicial system and, in particular, the use of strategic litigation tools. The organisation is mainly based in Turin, but has active members all over Europe. Although mainly composed of lawyers, it includes professionals from various fields – such as doctors, psychologists, social-media managers and journalists – to approach human rights protection from an holistic and multidisciplinary perspective.

UpRights is a non-profit initiative based in The Hague, Netherlands. UpRights strives for effective access to justice for victims of serious human rights violations and international crimes. UpRights works in collaboration with civil society and international organisations to promote victims’ rights, providing professional assistance on matters concerning international criminal law and human rights law. Our team includes professionals from international criminal Tribunals and UN Commissions of Inquiry with extensive knowledge of human rights and international criminal law.

In a Blogpost published on Opinio Juris as part of a symposium on the current crisis in Myanmar, UpRights co-founder Valérie Gabard and Kingsley Abbott, the Director of Global Accountability & International Justice at the International Commission of Jurists. argue that post-coup violations should be investigated as crimes against humanity under article 7 of the International Criminal Court Statute.

The post argues that considering this conclusion, it is critical that: States support the mandate of the Independent investigative Mechanism for Myanmar (IIMM), which has announced that crimes against humanity have “likely been committed” since the coup; possible for a for legal proceedings are actively identified, where evidence collected by the IIMM could help facilitate justice for the people of Myanmar; and the UN Security Council refer Myanmar to the ICC.

To read the full blog post follow the link

In a blogpost published on OpinioJuris, UpRights co-founder Alessandro Pizzuti and Dr. Clare Frances Moran from Edinburgh Napier University discuss the human rights implications of the Memorandum of Understanding signed between Italy and Libya in 2017.

The support provided by Italy pursuant to the Memorandum of Understanding has enhanced the capacity of the Libyan Coast Guard to intercept migrants at sea and return them to Libya where they are subjected to systematic abuses including torture, sexual violence, and murder. These forms of abuses may amount to violations of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR), the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) and the Convention against Torture (CAT). To the extent that Italy’s support to the Libyan authorities is instrumental to such violations, these instruments may apply extraterritorially, attracting Italy’s responsibility for such acts.

Read the full blogpost on OpinioJuris!

In July, Uprights released a concluding that Italy’s cooperation with Libyan authorities under the MoU is in violation of its human rights obligations and that the agreement needs to be reframed consistently in accordance with international law standards.